Reporter ohne Grenzen: Stellungnahme zum Verbot des unabhängigen russischen Fernsehsenders Doschd

Reporters Without Borders condemns yesterday’s decision by the National Radio and TV Council (NRTC) to ban Russian independent TV channel Dozhd from being retransmitted in Ukraine.

Ukrainian broadcasters will have to comply with the ban within one month of its official publication, expected on 16 January.

The NRTC, which regulates broadcasting in Ukraine, accuses Dozhd of violating the country’s territorial integrity by treating Crimea as part of Russia, and of violating a restrictions on advertising on certain foreign TV channels.

Dozhd is nonetheless very outspoken in its criticism of the Kremlin and until now has been widely retransmitted in Ukraine, where it has as much as a quarter of its entire audience.

“Even if the regulator has identified breaches of Ukraine’s laws, there are no grounds for such a drastic sanction as banning Dozhd,” said Johann Bihr, the head of RSF’s Eastern Europe and Central Asia desk. “This is a media freedom violation, a measure that—judged by international standards—it is neither necessary nor proportionate.

“Independent media have a key role to play in maintaining a link between population groups that have been separated by war and propaganda. We ask the Ukrainian authorities to rescind this decision without delay.”

According to article 19 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, which Ukraine has ratified, any restrictions on freedom of expression in a democratic society must not only be legal but also legitimate and necessary.

Dozhd—hounded in Russia

Russia’s only independent national TV channel, Dozhd has been much persecuted in its own country. Dropped by the main Russian satellite and cable TV providers and evicted from its offices in 2014, it has lost a large part of its public and advertisers.

Describing Crimea as Ukrainian territory is punishable by imprisonment under Russia’s recently toughened legislation on “separatism.” Dozhd had to comply, but that has not stopped it from referring to Russia’s “annexation” of the Crimean peninsula or continuing to provide critical coverage of Russian policy in Ukraine.

Bihr said: “You cannot help smiling at the Kremlin’s virulent protests about Ukraine’s ban on Dozhd, given that this TV channel can no longer be viewed by most Russians. If Moscow really cared about media freedom, it would start by lifting the restrictions on Dozhd and all the other independent media outlets in Russia.”

“Information war” abuses in Ukraine

RSF has often condemned media freedom violations in Ukraine that have been committed in the name of combatting Russian propaganda. Last week, uniformed members of the “Rapira” veterans association stormed into the offices of Klen, a cable TV provider in Chernomorsk, in the south of the country, and, using threats, forced it to suspend localretransmission of Dozhd’s programming.

On 30 December, President Petro Poroshenko promulgated a law under which a prior permit is now required to import any Russian books. The law introduced the concept of “aggressor state promotion or propaganda” into Ukraine’s legislation.

“We expect the Ukrainian authorities to defend media freedom against activist minorities, not to join them in their excesses,” Bihr added. “Combatting Russian propaganda is legitimate but does not under any circumstances justify intolerance or limiting pluralism.”

Even when no longer available via satellite and cable TV services, Dozhd will still be available online in Ukraine to subscribers.

Ukraine is ranked 107th out of 180 countries in RSF’s 2016 World Press Freedom Index. Russia is ranked 148th.

Quelle: <https://rsf.org/en/news/ukraine-bans-independent-russian-tv-channel-dozhd>

Zum Weiterlesen

Analyse

Über dem Gesetz: Das »andere« Amtsverständnis ukrainischer Parlamentarier und die Frage der Abgeordnetenimmunität

Von Ingmar Bredies
In den ersten Monaten des Jahres 2009 haben einige hochrangige Politiker in Deutschland nachhaltige politische Konsequenzen für persönliches Fehlverhalten ziehen müssen. Die politische Elite in Osteuropa trägt hingegen noch immer in unterschiedlichem Maße Züge eines »Klubs der Unnahbaren«. Dieser Beitrag versucht diesem »anderen« Amts-, Selbst- und Fremdverständnis der politischen Klasse insbesondere in der Ukraine auf den Grund zu gehen. Wo liegen die Ursachen hierfür? Welche Auswirkungen hat dies vor allem auf den Demokratisierungsprozess sowie den Verlauf und die Erfolgsaussichten des politischen Systemwechsels? (…)
Zum Artikel
Analyse

Volle Fahrt zurück! Richtungswechsel in der Geschichts- und Identitätspolitik

Von Ingmar Bredies
In der Ukraine konkurrieren zwei gegensätzliche Konzeptionen der Geschichts- und Identitätspolitik. Seit dem Amtsantritt Präsident Janukowitschs im Februar 2010 ist eine klare Abwendung von den Grundlagen und Bezugspunkten der Politik seines Amtsvorgängers Juschtschenko zu erkennen, was unmittelbare Konsequenzen für die Politikgestaltung in vielen Bereichen hat. Die bisherigen Deutungsmuster der ukrainischen Geschichte sowie der staatlich »verordnete« Nationalismus werden nun abgelöst durch ein Wiederaufleben des »autoritären Eklektizismus« (Wilfried Jilge) der Kutschma-Periode und die Vermischung von Elementen der sowjetischen Historiografie mit nationalukrainischen Elementen.
Zum Artikel

Logo FSO
Logo DGO
Logo ZOIS
Logo DPI
Logo IAMO
Logo IOS