Foltervorwürfe von Amnesty International und ukrainische Reaktion

Amnesty International: Overwhelming new evidence of prisoners being tortured and killed amid conflict (22.05.2015)

Overwhelming evidence of ongoing war crimes, including torture and summary killings of prisoners, serve as a stark reminder of the brutal practices being committed on a near-daily basis in eastern Ukraine’s conflict, Amnesty International said in a comprehensive new briefing today.

Breaking Bodies: Torture and summary killings in eastern Ukraine provides compelling evidence of frequent and widespread prisoner abuse by a broad range of captors on both sides of the conflict.

Former prisoners described being beaten until their bones broke, tortured with electric shocks, kicked, stabbed, hung from the ceiling, deprived of sleep for days, threatened with death, denied urgent medical care and subjected to mock executions.

“In the shadow of eastern Ukraine’s still-smouldering conflict, our on-the-ground research shows that accounts of detainee torture are as commonplace as they are shocking. More than 30 former prisoners held by both sides gave us consistent and harrowing accounts of their captors’ abuse,” said John Dalhuisen, Europe and Central Asia Programme Director at Amnesty International.

“Prisoners on both sides have been beaten and subjected to mock executions. We have also documented summary killings of those held by separatist groups. It is a war crime to torture or deliberately kill captives taken during conflict.

“Pro-Kyiv and separatist forces alike must put an end to these crimes and ensure that all fighters under their control are aware of the consequences under international law of abusing prisoners amid an armed conflict. The Ukrainian authorities must investigate all allegations of war crimes and other abuses, open files and collect evidence of abuses by separatist forces and bring to justice all those responsible for perpetrating such heinous acts.”

Out of 33 former prisoners interviewed by Amnesty International, 32 described severe beatings or other serious abuse being meted out by separatist and pro-Kyiv groups alike. All of them were held captive at some point between July 2014 and April 2015, and the organization conducted most of the interviews in March, April and May of this year.

Amnesty International corroborated the victims’ testimonies against additional evidence, including x-rays of broken bones, hospital records, photographs of bruises and other injuries, scars, and missing teeth. Two of the victims were still nursing their wounds in hospital at the time of their interviews.

A broad range of captors aligned with both sides in the conflict are allegedly carrying out this torture and ill-treatment. Of the former prisoners Amnesty International interviewed, 17 had been held by separatists and 16 by pro-Kyiv military and law enforcement officials, including the Security Service of Ukraine (SBU).

Amnesty International has also identified at least three recent incidents where separatist fighters summarily killed a total of at least eight pro-Kyiv fighters. This is based on eyewitness testimony, hospital records, evidence posted on social networks and media reports. In an interview with a journalist, one separatist armed group leader openly admitted to killing captive Ukrainian soldiers, a war crime.

Most of the worst abuses take place in informal places of detention. This typically occurs during the initial days of captivity, and groups outside the official or de facto chain of command tend to be especially violent and lawless.

The situation on the separatist side is particularly chaotic, with a variety of different groups holding captives in at least a dozen known locations.

On the pro-Kyiv side, a report by a former prisoner held by Right Sector, a nationalist militia, was especially disturbing. Using an abandoned youth camp as an ad hoc prison, Right Sector has reportedly held dozens of civilian prisoners as hostages, brutally torturing them and extorting large amounts of money from them and their families. Amnesty International has alerted the Ukrainian authorities to these specific allegations but has not received a response.

Amnesty International has found that both sides are arbitrarily holding civilians who have not committed any crime, but who sympathize with the opposing side. The organization spoke to civilians who were detained and beaten merely for having photographs from the EuroMaydan protests on their mobile phones, or for having telephone numbers of separatist contacts.

“In some cases, these civilians are detained as currency for prisoner exchanges, but it also may be simply to punish them for their views. This is a disturbing and illegal practice that must be stopped immediately,” said John Dalhuisen.

Amnesty International is calling on relevant UN agencies and experts to undertake an urgent mission to Ukraine to visit all detention sites for prisoners held in connection with the conflict—including unofficial places of detention. Those that should take part include the Subcommittee on Prevention of Torture and other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment, the Working Groups on arbitrary detention and enforced disappearances, and the Special Rapporteur on torture.

Quelle: <>

SSU is opened to dialogue with international organizations regarding detained individuals conditions of staying on the territory of Ukraine (22.05.2015)

The Security Service of Ukraine is opened to dialogue with international organizations regarding detained individuals conditions of staying on the territory of Ukraine.

Taking into account Amnesty International report on the usage of tortures towards captives by the sides of the conflict in the east of Ukraine, which was promulgated today, the SSU proposes to conduct the meeting with the representatives of this organization.

It is important to underline, that there are any captives either in the SSU no in Ukraine1. Today the SSU detains individuals, which are suspected in the offence against state security, commitment of actions, directed into the violent change or overthrowing of the constitutional system or seizure of state power, terrorist activity, and commitment of other offences. According to the court decision the SSU takes custody as a preventive measure for them.

The facts of detention, initiation of criminal proceedings, and their direction into court are constantly promulgated by the SSU on the official site, during briefings and interviews of the Service chairmanship.

Quelle: <>1 Sic; sinngemäß soll der Satz wohl erklären, dass es weder beim SBU noch in der Ukraine Gefangene gibt – Anm. d. Red.

Zum Weiterlesen


Kommunikation als Mittel der Reintegration der Bevölkerung im Donbass

Von Yelizaveta Rekhtman
Während in der Ukraine die Zweckmäßigkeit der Minsker Vereinbarungen weiterhin in Frage gestellt wird und die politische Zukunft der nicht unter Kontrolle der Ukraine stehenden Gebiete der Oblaste Donezk und Luhansk offen bleibt, zeigen einschlägige Untersuchungen in diesen Regionen, dass die Intensität der Beziehungen zwischen der Ukraine und den Einwohnern dieser Gebiete weiter nachlässt. Zur Reintegration der nicht unter Kontrolle der Ukraine stehenden Gebiete könnte eine Kommunikationsstrategie des Meinungs- und Informationsaustauschs beitragen. Sie müsste dabei Bestandteil der ukrainischen Staatspolitik sein oder als eine eigenständige staatliche Kommunikationspolitik in Bezug auf die genannten Regionen ausgearbeitet werden.
Zum Artikel

»Gatekeepers« in Krisenzeiten: Wie Journalisten die Einflüsse auf Nachrichten über den Ostukraine-Konflikt wahrnehmen

Von Antonia Schaefer
Die konträre Berichterstattung im Ostukraine-Konflikt wurde von verschiedenen Seiten als Cyberwar, Informationskrieg oder gar Propaganda bezeichnet. In einer qualitativen Studie wurde untersucht, welche Einflüsse in dieser unübersichtlichen Konfliktsituation auf ukrainische und deutsche Journalisten einwirken. Besonders die Diskussion externer Einflüsse macht deutlich, wie ein von Unsicherheit, Fehlinformationen und plötzlich auftretendem Patriotismus geprägtes Umfeld Journalisten auf beiden Seiten zur Reflexion ihrer Rolle und ihrer Verantwortung veranlasst. Die Frage nach einem ethischen Umgang des Journalismus mit den Bedingungen des Informationskriegs bleibt ungeklärt.
Zum Artikel

Logo FSO
Logo DGO
Logo DPI
Logo IOS